Home  Clients  How We Work  Services  Case Studies   About Us


Building teams
Saturday, October 28th, 2006

Working in teams is something that many of us take for granted.  Perhaps, we have always been in roles where we had to build teams.  Maybe, we think others have done so as well.  As I have discovered over the last year of teaching a college course on team building, there are many who have not learned to build teams.  Beyond that, we often discover that some of the team building approaches that one person uses are different from what others are using. 

When starting to build a team, one of the first questions to consider is why you are doing so.  There are many reasons that we may wish to build teams.  These reasons often include:

  1. Efficiency
  2. Effectiveness
  3. Specialization - teams can help filling in knowledge gaps
  4. Scalability - teams remove bottlenecks
  5. Better ideas because more people think about an issue
  6. Teams allow us to build on each other’s ideas
  7. Teams may help us reduce costs over other options

A common model for the stages of team building consists of forming, storming, norming, performing, and transforming.  What activities are associated with each stage of team develoment?  What are some tactical tips that we can use for each stage of the team’s development?  These are two questions that will be discussed in this article. 

As we talking about each stage, remember that we may go through the phase multiple times during the course of a project.  

Forming

Forming a team requires a lot of effort.  After deciding why we are building a team, we need to decide who to invite to join our team.  A team needs to be diverse in terms of how the members approach issues, their perspectives, and their experiences. 

Early in the development of a team, we must build trust.  There are no shortcuts to building trust.  Trust should be based on knowledge, shared understanding, and knowledge of how each team member will react in a particular situation.  This is why trust is often built over time.  We can take a variety of steps to make it easier for others to trust us by: 

  1. Being honest
  2. Helping others
  3. Sharing information
  4. Caring about others (and showing it)
  5. Recognizing our strengths and weaknesses
  6. Paying attention to others (no mulitasking)
  7. Being trustworthy
  8. Meeting deadlines and other commitments
  9. Respecting others
  10. Getting to know others on the team
  11. Keeping an open mind
  12. Trusting others

Of these steps, communication is one of the most important.  Honesty in our communication can eliminate concerns about trust, make it possible for hidden agendas to be revealed so that team members can be successful at an individual level, eliminate speculation about our motives, and reveal differences in our expectations and assumptions.  Revealing that we need help from someone else is sometimes seen as a weakness.  In a team situation, revealing that we need help from someone else is actually a strength. 

A team contract or team agreement is one of the best tactics to help people become team members.  In many organizations, team contracts and team charters are mere formality.  In other organizations, they are not even used.  A better approach is to use written team agreements to reflect how the team agrees to work together.  The agreements should reflect information like:

  1. What is the agreed up on purpose of the team?
  2. How and when will each member evaluate his or her success, and on what criteria?
  3. How and when will the team evalute its success, and on what criteria?
  4. What steps will the team take to complete the project?
  5. What is an initial timeline for completing the project?
  6. To meet the timeline, what steps will be needed and who will be responsible for these steps?

The team contract is intended as a roadmap to help us work through the project.  As additional information becomes available, we need to come together as a team and make modificatons.  While we use the term “team contract,” there is no particular form that the team contract “should” take.  It should be written down, however, it need not be in a signed contract.  It could be contained in a series of memos that document what was discussed in the meeting and are shared with other members of the team.  Another approach is to write up a team contract as a stand alone document, sometimes called a team charter.

One element that is always good to consider in the team contract relates to meetings.  How and when will the team meet?  Who manages the agenda?  What steps should be taken if an issue arises between meetings? 

Storming

After the team is formed, there is a “honeymoon” period in which things all function smoothly.  Then, almost invariably, something happens which causes conflict.  The factors that lead the conflict to surface are many and varied.  A team member may leave.  We may realize that some of our assumptions and expectations are different from what others are assuming and expecting.  Perhaps, the project parameters change.  Maybe, the definition of success or business objectives  change.  This conflict, regardless of the cause, is an indication that we are in the storming phase of team development.

If we have done a thorough job of working through our team, organizational, and individual expectations and aligned our interests, our team is going to be better prepared to deal with issues that may arise during the storming phase. 

Norming

In the norming stage, team members develop a better understanding of how to work together.  Their understanding of their own expectations increases.  They also learn what their teammates are expecting of them.  Roles may be refined during the norming phase.  Team expectations and methods of working together may be clarified as well.

In some cases, there may not have been an official leader, structured approach to communications, agreement about what was to be communicated, designated notetaker, or agreement on how the team would make decisions before.  In the norming phase, the team often decides issues such as these.

In strategic sourcing, supply chain management, or sales teams, the team may decide what criteria will be used to make decisions about which suppliers, customers, or opportunities will be pursued.  Perhaps, the team also decides that it needs to have an interim and a longer term solutions.

As additional information has come to light and situations have arisen with the team, it may be necessary to make adjustments to procedures. These adjustments characterize the norming phase of team development.

Peforming

By going through the forming, storming, and norming steps, people on a team begin to know what to expect from each other, and themselves.  They start to become comfortable working with others.  Perhaps, they no longer feel as much need to check up on each other.  We begin to trust our teammates to know and meet our expectations.  We also begin to trust that our teammates will bring issues to our attention, if we have set this as an expectation.

In the performing stage, we evaluate the team’s results, and our own.  Ths is something that, ideally, we should do throughout the project, rather than saving it to the end.  Periodically, it is a good idea to have checkpoints.  At a minimum, we should look at the timeline and elements that have been agreed up on in the team contract.  A better strategy is to just do what we used to call a “sanity check” during meetings.  Does each team member feel like the team is still on track?  If not, we need to address it.

Transforming

The final stage of a team is transforming.  In the transforming stage, the team has completed its activities and is able to hand the project off or the objective has been fully realized.

On many teams, the transformation is more of a transition, than a closure.  This is especially true in a procurement or sales situation.  After the contract is negotiated, for example, the project may be transitioned to the team which will actually manage the launch of the product or service that has been acquired.  In a sales situation, the sales team often hands the project off to a team that handles the fulfillment.

In the transforming stage, a best practice is for the team to identify and document lessons learned.  Perhaps, the team will want periodic updates on status from the team to whom the project has been handed off.  If so, that should be agreed on during this phase. 

Conclusion

We build teams for many different reasons.  To be successful in our team building, we should identify the reasons that we are building teams and develop a team contract. 

The team contract is a roadmap that will guide us through the project process.  It may take the form of or be integrted with a project plan.  There is no specific form that a team contract “should” take.  The form needs to be appropriate for our situation.

The stages of team building are, in many cases, forming, storming, norming, performing, and transforming.  Teams can revisit each stage at various points during the team’s life cycle.  The team may even be, simultaneously, in various stages of the team’s life cycle on different aspects of the project. 

The steps used to build teams will vary by organization, project, and preference of the team leader and members.

Posted in Team Building | No Comments »



Negotiating sustainable change
Friday, October 27th, 2006

In negotiations, sometimes, we have to ask the other party to change how it does business entirely.  If the relationship or transaction negotiation is important enough to the other party, the other party may agree to our request. 

Years pass.  The deal becomes less important.  The other party elects not to renew a contract.  The other party reverts back to its original position.  And, some wonder why.

The answer is simple.  The change was one that we demanded, rather than one that the other party actually adopted.  As long as the change is our idea because we have not allowed the other party to own it, the change may meet our needs, but the other party does not take ownership of the idea.  Over time, the other party may come to resent us for the change.  Beyond that, the other party is unlikely to realize the benefits that we envisioned for it.

When our goal is sustainable change, and we actually want something that, we believe will help the other party as well as ourselves, we increase the likelihood of success if we:

  1. Suggest changes, rather than forcing them,
  2. Explain why we see the change as being helpful to the other party,
  3. Understand what the other party is trying to accomplish,
  4. Care about the other party’s success,
  5. Provide a road map with tasks that are broken down into small, nonthreatening pieces, and
  6. Allow the other party to make an informed decision, rather than dictating what it must do.
Posted in Negotiations | No Comments »



Supporting work/life balance is in a firm’s best interest
Thursday, October 19th, 2006

We hear a lot about work/life balance.  In many large firms, there are formal programs to foster work/life balance.  In small companies, the issues can be even larger.

One of the messages that the work/life balance programs sometimes overlook is the importance of telling employees at all levels why it is so important to the organization that the employees try to maintain a better work/life balance. 

Employees think that they are doing the company a favor and being loyal by not taking breaks and by pushing themselves harder.  

Employees need to maintain a work/life balance so that they are:

  1. Creative
  2. Engaged
  3. Healthier
  4. Long-term employees

The importance of work/life balance increases as firms face adversity, mergers, acquisitions, and layoffs.

There are also a lot of work/life balance issues in smaller organizations.  The smaller organizations seldom have formal programs and, often, employees push themselves even harder in the small firms.  Sometimes, it isn’t feasible to take as much time off.  Look for opportunities to enjoy life though.

You will find the article at
http://www.forbes.com/2006/10/18/leadership-managing-careers-lead-manage-cx_ag_1018cashman.html

Take a break.  Go for a walk  Have a great day. You deserve it and are worth it.

Posted in Business Tips, Corporate Citizenship | No Comments »



Issues in international business relationships
Saturday, October 14th, 2006

Back in January, one of the discussion topics in this blog related to international business relationships.  Here is one of the postings about the topic. 

Most business relationships have a cultural component.  Even when one is just doing business locally, one may find international business components.  At the NCTC American Leadership Conference held on October 7th, 2006, Jim Falk of World Affairs Council said that:

1 in 5 jobs in the Dallas/Fort Worth area is tied to foreign activity

1/3 of the population in the Dallas/Fort Worth area is foreign born or first generation US born.

These statistics suggest that, even when one does business entirely within the US, it is important to understand cultural differences.

Every relationship is a little different.  Adequate preparation and obtaining appropriate advice is even more important in the international business context than when one is dealing with domestic business relationships.  How might one prepare?  Why is it important to do so?

Common sense suggests that when contemplating business relationships, adequate time should be allowed to prepare.  Let’s touch on three types of relationships that one may encounter.  From there, consider the steps that might be taken to evaluate the opportunity.  Finally, what issues can arise in an outsourcing/offshoring relationship? 

Situations

A firm in Europe asks a company in the US to provide services and products.    English is a second language for the other negotiator.

A school in Colombia wants to license curriculum and access to a computer systems to training students for employment opportunities.

To cut costs, a business is considering having its website developed or hosted in India.

Starting Point

When faced with these issues, it is important to look at a variety of factors.  Here are a few suggestions…

Learn about the culture and laws 

Start by understanding the laws and cultures of the countries involved.  The other country may have laws that look like those one knows.  Looks can be so deceiving though!  While the words may be the same, words must be interpreted in the context of the cultures involved. 

In my MBA program, we had the ability to go on a trip to China.  Chinese contract law is very similar to what one might find in the US.  Time and time again, businesses and consultants shared their stories about doing business in China.  Each time, it became clear that laws in China meant something other than what people in the US expected.  Relationships in China made impossible events possible. 

Risks can be managed better if one investigates the situation and understands the culture.  It can be very helpful to consult with someone who has handled similar transactions between the countries involved.   

International Association of Contract and Commercial Managers (http://www.iaccm.com/) can also be a good resource.  IACCM members have a lot of experience doing business in different countries.   

Build Relationship

Focus on building a relationship and getting to know the other parties.  The firms in other countries may be perfectly qualified to provide the services and products.  Many are.  By taking time to build the relationship, one makes it more likely that the parties will understand what both are seeking so that they can be more successful.  In addition, if one understands the other party, it is easier to care about that party being successful. 

Contract Issues

For people from the US, it can be surprising to do business even with an English-speaking country like the UK. 

A few years ago, I was negotiating a contract for services from a UK firm.  The UK firm did not want to contract directly.  As it turned out, the contract which we were using in the US - about 25 pages in length - was longer than the UK firm was equipped to deal with. 

A different (and larger) UK firm was willing to sign any contract that was presented to it.  The firm was surprised that I took the time to walk through the contract with it.  As we walked through the contract and talked about issues that had arisen on prior engagements with other companies, our teams got to know each other and to understand our differences. 

Outsourcing and offshoring

When outsourcing, products and services are sometimes provided by firms located in India, China, and other countries.  The goal is to reduce cost.  Sometimes, it works.  In other cases, the total cost can actually increase.

Here are a few of the challenges that can sometimes arise in the context of offshoring: 

  1. Developing understanding.  It requires a conscious effort to understand the subtle differences in cultures.  The importance of contracts, protections afforded intellectual property, and views about acceptable practices are three specific issues that need to be considered.  Offshoring is generally not a short-term engagement.
  2. While it may sound like the other party is saying the same thing that you are, this similarity may be superficial.  Cultural differences often exist.  Talking about specific situations that could arise in the execution can help avoid unpleasant surprises.
  3. Decide how the parties will communicate.  In many cases one party is likely to be starting its work day while the other party’s work day is approaching its conclusion.  As a result, both parties are seldom at their best.  In an on-going relationship, it is always a good idea to include verbal discussions, rather than relying on e-mail.
  4. Face-to-face meetings are difficult and expensive to arrange.  Many insist on face-to-face meetings as a step in building trust.  Those who do so may discover that the parties do not have representatives in country.
  5. Consider the needs of both parties with regard to world events, economic conditions, socioeconomic differences, ethical issues, and political issues.  Such events may impact the need for the products and services, or a party’s ability to deliver the products and services.
  6. In some cases, one or both parties may have culturally and legally mandated obligations with regard to due diligence in managing organizational resources.  Decide how to satisfy these obligations as part of the contract negotiation.   
  7. Financial ability to deliver or to pay for the products and services can be an issue with international transactions.  Parties are accustomed to certain levels of information and tests to ensure that information is valid.  With an international transaction, additional steps may be needed such as special payment methods, letters of credit, and escrows.
  8. Plan for surprises.  This is important in any major relationship, but especially in the context of international business relationships.  If a surprise arises, how will it be communicated?  What is the timeline?  What are the contingency plans for both parties in case the issue cannot be resolved quickly? 
  9. Be honest with yourselves and with each other.  If a relationship is not going to meet your needs, it is far better to walk away than to end up in a situation where you and the other party are locked in a contract that sets you up to fail.

Some outsource to firms that offshore as a way of managing the risks.  That can be a reasonable strategy in some cases.  When one chooses this approach though, it is critical to understand the prime supplier’s experience and expertise in managing such relationships.  If the prime supplier lacks experience in this area, where does that leave the customer?

Feedback

Most of these tips are common sense.  Sometimes, common sense gets overlooked or discounted in our quest for more customers and to cut costs. 

In January 2007, I will be teaching a class on international business at a local community college.  If you have stories or suggestions about doing business internationally, please feel free to send me a note.  

revised Jan 4, 2007.

Posted in Business Acumen, Cultural Issues, Negotiations | 1 Comment »



Compromise on quality to lower price?
Monday, October 9th, 2006

At times, seeking a lower price can require one to compromise on quality.  This can be an acceptable tradeoff.  Unacceptable quality for one customer may meet another customer’s needs.  This is one reason that it is so important to understand your needs when negotiating any relationship.  This is equally true whether you are negotiating from a supplier’s perspective or on behalf of a customer.

Example

Suppose that a computer manufacturer has 1 defective computer for every 100 manufactured. 

In a large operation that had storage space for 5 or 10 extra computers, this might be acceptable.  Of course, the operation should consider replacements and maintenance in assessing the situation. 

In a remote operation or if computers were supporting real time stock or commodities trading, this might be unacceptable even with backup. 

Questions

There are a variety of questions that you may want to understand in order to decide whether it is appropriate to compromise on quality.  These questions could include: 

  1. How will the product or service be used?
  2. What parameters, constraints, and timelines relate to the manner in which the product or service is used?
  3. What would a quality defect mean for your business?
  4. What resources will be expended dealing with a quality defect, if one occurs?
  5. Are you willing to accept the risks regarding quality in order to receive the lower price?

Key Points

Before trading quality for price, make certain that the risk has been identified so that you and your clients understand the pros and the cons associated with the proposed approach. 

Price may not reflect the costs that would be incurred if the products or services are defective.  

Consider your remediation costs and whether the defect would hurt your relationships with your customers.   

Considerations

Identify possible solutions in case a problem arises.  At times,  having replacement equipment available is an acceptable alternative.  If you opt for this approach, make sure that you consider:

  1. How much replacement equipment is needed
  2. Where the replacement equipment will be stored
  3. The amount of effort and time that will be required to set up the replacement equipment
  4. Whether resources will be available to set up the replacement equipment
  5. Maintenance costs over the life of the equipment

There are instances where it makes sense to compromise on quality to control costs.  There are also cases where this is not a good tradeoff to make.  

Posted in Negotiations, Solving Problems, Sourcing | No Comments »



Solving Business Puzzles through Offshoring
Monday, October 9th, 2006

Business puzzles are often complex.  Many firms are trying to find ways to control costs, provide high quality products and services, and meet their customers’ desired timelines and specifications.  To achieve these goals, some firms rely on outsourcing.  

A fairly common approach to outsourcing is having products produced in countries that have lower labor costs.  Sometimes, this approach works.  There are risks when you outsource or offshore.  Due diligence is one step to take when dealing with outsourcing and offshoring.  Let’s look at the situation with Heeling Sports Ltd. and look at the following questions:

  1. What is the Heeling situation?
  2. What is due diligence?
  3. How much diligence is due?
  4. Is the Heeling situation a surprise?
  5. What lessons can be learned?
  6. What does it mean?

Situation

According to various news reports, Heeling Sports Ltd obtained patents in China.  The firm then contracted with factories in China for the manufacturing of their shoes with a wheel (Heelys). 

In some cases, the factories were used to create counterfeit products based on Heeling’s patent.  Heeling sued and won in Chinese courts.  The infringers are not being shut down and the profits generated by the infringing parties are not being confiscated.  From Heeling’s perspective, it may appear that the victories are rather hollow.

Due Diligence

When making business decisions, it is a good idea to identify and plan for risk.  The idea is that we should avoid risks that we deem excessive relative to the potential reward.  Due diligence suggests that we investigate the situation and make a conscious decision about the rewards relative to the risks.  Contingency planning, risk management, and appropriate safeguards (including insurance and contract protections) are often strategies for providing appropriate diligence in our business activities.     

Appropriate Levels of Diligence

When deciding how much diligence is due, firms often look at factors such as the potential rewards, the novelty of the issue, what others have experienced, the nature of the risk, and steps that can be taken to protect the business from the risk.

Now, let’s think about what happened with Heeling.  Is this issue unique in firms that are offshoring to China?  Microsoft, Disney, and many clothing manufacturers are having with their products being “knocked off” for many years.

Surprises?

While the issue of knockoffs and misuse of intellectual property has been on-going in several countries, China seems to have a particularly bad reputation in this regard. 

It seems to me that the same factors that make China an attractive location for offshoring also make it a particularly risky country for firms that are offshoring production.  These factors include:

  • Standard of living
  • Enforcement issues
  • Cultural differences
  • Relaxed regulations and laws
  • Cost of raw materials including labor

Lessons to be Learned

There are many lessons that we may learn from Heeling’s experience.

This situation points to the importance of understanding the business risks and building contracts that protect firms from the business risks.

Rather than relying on assumptions about the enforcement of patents granted to foreign companies or their local partners, it is a good idea to investigate the issue thoroughly.  For example, it might be a good idea to check with the US Embassy, attorneys, and consultants specializing in doing business in the country involved.

Situations like this seem to reinforce the importance of focusing on the total cost of ownership associated with a decision, rather than just on the price. 

I wonder what safeguards were taken to prevent the risks that have now arisen.  One of the approaches that can help avoid issues is to hope for the best, but plan for the worst.  If you do this, the risks of being surprised are quite small.

Meaning

The intellectual property issues that have arisen do not necessarily mean that offshoring was a bad idea for Heeling.  We don’t know what would have happened to Heeling if it had opted to stay onshore or to rely on insourced manufacturing.

Some firms find offshoring the only viable route to market for their products and services.  For these firms, the potential rewards outweigh the risks. 

It seems to me that this case illustrates the importance of using due diligence, identifying risks, building contracts and business models that enable us to manage the risks, and having contingency plans to deal with situations that don’t work out as well as we might have hoped.  

Posted in Negotiations, Sourcing | No Comments »