Home  Clients  How We Work  Services  Case Studies   About Us


Building Relationships - IV Part 3
Saturday, March 31st, 2007

As you may remember, Connie Customer and Sam Supplier are dealing with issues that may arise when Connie Customer’s customer decides to consolidate its supplier base.

So far, we have discussed the reasons that Connie’s customer may wish to consolidate its supplier base and the concerns that Connie and Sam may have upon learning of the supplier consolidation.

Today, we discuss how having strong relationships might help Connie, Sam, and Connie’s customer as they try to achieve their business objectives.

Ideally, Connie and Sam will have a very strong relationship and Connie will have a strong relationship with Connie’s customer.  The ideal relationship between Sam and Connie’s customer varies by preference and the nature of the products or services involved. 

Suppose that Connie and Sam have a strong relationship.  What are some of the benefits of such a relationship?  Asked differently, how might the relationship between Connie and Sam help customers?

The short answer is that there are many potential benefits to customers from using suppliers who have strong relationships.  These benefits may include:

  • Lower risk of nonperformance 
  • Better management of business conflicts 
  • Access to better information in a timely manner
  • Increased ability to anticipate the customer’s needs 
  • Customer frustation with the suppliers may be reduced 
  • Customer may be more confident that suppliers can deliver  
  • Administration of the agreement may be easier and less expensive 
  • Creation of better solutions because more perspectives are considered 

From Connie and Sam’s perspectives, a strong relationship can facilitate trust, lead to additional business opportunities, reduce administrative costs, and reduce the parties’ frustration. 

What are some of the other benefits that you see to Connie, Sam, and Connie’s customer?

In addition to those benefits, there are costs associated with relationships.  Connie, Sam, and Connie’s customer have to invest time in maintaining the relationship.  They also take risks in building the relationship - their time may not lead to business or they may spend more time on the relationship than is warranted by the situation.   

Next time, we will discuss specific steps that Connie and Sam may want to take after learning about the consolidation effort.

Posted in Negotiations, Planning Tips, Sourcing | No Comments »



Building Relationships - IV Part 2
Friday, March 30th, 2007

Our discussion of why Connie Customer and Sam Supplier would want to build a long-term business relationship continues. 

Today’s topic is the issues that Connie and Sam may be concerned with when they learn that a customer is consolidating its supplier base.

In a situation like this, it may be inevitable to focus on self-interest.  The first reaction that many people have on learning that a customer is consolidating its supplier base is likely to be, “what does this mean for me?”

Supplier consolidation efforts can put suppliers like Connie at odds with their suppliers like Sam.  This is especially common if the customer is a source of a high percentage of revenue for Connie.  It can also be a particularly large issue if:

  • Connie has a commitment contract with Sam,
  • Sam has extended very favorable credit terms to Connie,
  • Sam has provided substantial trade credit to Connie, or
  • Based on expectations of future business opportunies, Sam has changed his business direction to support Connie’s business and her customer in question. 

When Connie and Sam first learn of the supplier consolidation, the initial reaction of “what does it mean for me,” is likely to be followed by a question about how this challenge can become an opportunity.  In looking at this issue, Connie and Sam may consider questions like:

  • How might this issue be beneficial to their businesses and what would be required to make it beneficial?
  • What other firms might need the same or similar products and services to those that Connie’s customer has been purchasing?
  • Do Connie and Sam have proven alliances with firms that are likely to be selected as key suppliers?
  • Is Connie’s firm likely to be retained as a direct supplier? 

The third reaction that often comes up in a supplier consolidation effort is that Connie and Sam are likely to start trying to obtain additional information.  In a large organization, the decision may be communicated by senior officers, procurement, or finance.  It can take days and weeks for people to understand what is really involved.  Most suppliers want to know why the approach is being taken, how the decision will be made, what the decision criteria will be, and the time line for making decisions. 

A fourth reaction that firms sometimes experience is to deny that the change will impact them or to try to influence the decision process. 

What other reactions have you seen when a firm is faced with a supplier consolidation effort by a key customer? 

Posted in Negotiations, Solving Problems, Sourcing | No Comments »



Doing business with friends?
Friday, March 30th, 2007

When people leave the corporate environment, there tend to be a lot of companies who want to stay in touch and would like to do business.  They want to “help” the person.  Often, those people have merely switched sides of the table.  Rather than representing the large company, they are representing a supplier and selling to their former coworkers. 

When I left SBC Communications, I decided to walk a different path.  While some at SBC and some former suppliers wanted to do business with me, my initial reaction was, “No.  I am not leaving SBC to switch sides of the table.”  Many disagreed with that decision.   

Two and a half years out, the decision was the right one for me.  I am just now in the position to start my business.  Maybe, SBC and some of the other firms will want to do business.  Maybe, they will not.  Only time will tell.

This posting discusses some of the factors that led to my decision.  Perhaps, it will be helpful to others.  The factors that led to my decision are:

  • Relationships have to evolve
  • Interests of the parties have to be aligned
  • Good business decisions are in everyone’s interest
  • Friendships are compatible with good business decisions

Let’s consider these issues…

Relationships

When people work together, they grow to expect each other to behave in particular ways.  It creates a set of expectations between the parties (a psychological contract). 

Sometimes, people act in a manner that is inconsistent with their psychological contracts.  This causes a lot of conflict.  That is the storming stage of team building, right? 

Most people dislike conflict.  As a result, to avoid the conflict, they act in the expected manner.  This is a form of “self monitoring.” 

If a person is seen as an “X,” whatever X may be, it is difficult for the person to take on a different role.  All parties in the relationship have difficulty adjusting to the change.  Most people accept this and become the X that others think of them as being, or something very similar.

What this means is that, if one wants to evolve to a new role, it can be easiest to leave the organization and to walk away from relationships that existed previously. 

In my case, I was tired of being told to be a typical procurement person and to stay inside that box.  Needs of the business must come first.

Interests of the Parties

The interests of the parties must be consistent with the needs of the businesses involved.  Personal friendships should not be allowed to prevent the needs of the business from being achieved. 

When people have worked together for several years, it can be difficult for them to separate personal friendship from needs of the business.  This means that, in many cases, personal friendships need to end in order for people to move forward with business ideas.

Good Business Decisions

Making good business decisions is in everyone’s best interest.  At the end of the day, business decisions must be defensible.  This is especially true in the wake of corporate scandals and Sarbanes-Oxley.

Selecting suppliers based on personal friendships result in bad business decisions.  For friendships to endure over the long-term, it seems to me that business decisions must be made independent of those friendships. 

It is difficult to see friends struggle.  As a result, the friends may have to distance themselves.  This allows the people involved to build from the past and towards the future, rather than holding each other back. 

An approach that helped me was to build a new network of people who are similarly situated so that we can help each other learn.

Friendships

Friendships can be compatible with making good business decisions.  The friends that we keep need to be appropriate for the decisions that we make and the direction that we are going.

Conclusion

Is this an issue that you have faced?  If so, please share your experience. 

Do you do business with friends?  If so, what steps did you take to ensure that the business you do meets the needs of the business?

Posted in About Coleen Davis, Business Acumen | No Comments »



Building Relationships - IV
Thursday, March 29th, 2007

Our discussion of why Connie Customer and Sam Supplier would want to build a long-term business relationship continues. 

As promised, we will talk about a situation in which Connie and Sam work together to deal with a supplier consolidation effort by Connie’s customer.

Feedback indicates that the last posting was a little overwhelming.  As a result, we are going to break this down into four parts which are:

  • Why might Connie’s customer want to reduce the number of suppliers from whom it is making purchases?
  • What issues might Connie and Sam be concerned about when learning that the customer is consolidating its supplier base?
  • How might relationships help Connie, Sam, and Connie’s customer achieve their business objectives in this situation?
  • What steps might Connie and Sam take upon hearing about the consolidation effort?

Our discussion begins now with consideration of why a customer might want to reduce the number of firms from whom it is making purchases.  Is this a situation that you have faced?  If so, you are in good company.  A lot of firms are trying to reduce their supplier bases.

When I think about reductions in the number of suppliers used, the five reasons which come to mind for me are: 

  • Reductions might increase the consistency surrounding a particular product or service.
  • The number of suppliers may make it difficult for the firm to comply with the provisions of each contract.  Having been responsible for relationships with 5,000 suppliers in a former life, I know how time consuming this can be.
  • In many cases, firms offer volume discounts that might increase if the supplier base was reduced.
  • Sometimes, suppliers include exclusivity clauses in contracts.  Such clauses do not require customers to purchase any of the product or service at all.  When the customer does purchase the product or service though, the clauses require that the customer buy the products or services from the firm(s) named in the contract.
  • Connie’s customer may believe that reducing the number of suppliers will reduce the firm’s overhead and administrative costs.  Contract negotiation and contract management can be very exensive in many firms.

What other reasons can you think of that might lead Connie’s customer to reduce the number of firms that it wishes to use? 

Posted in Negotiations, Planning Tips | No Comments »



Making good business decisions
Thursday, March 29th, 2007

After several months of discussions and building a relationship with a potential customer, it is apparent that the customer does not need your help.  Perhaps, your help would even duplicate services that others are providing.

Most of the sales training on the market today teaches people to sell, sell, sell in this situation.  They should talk up the value of what they are offering, at least that is what the training says. 

If faced with this situation, what would you like the sales people calling on you to do?  What do you do when you are the sales person?

Posted in Leadership, Negotiations | No Comments »



Building Relationships - III
Wednesday, March 28th, 2007

Our discussion of why Connie Customer and Sam Supplier would want to build a long-term business relationship continues. 

How might relationships that lower cost, are easy to use, offer predictability, provide referral opportunities, streamline operations, and capitalize on synergies add value for Connie and Sam?  The answer depends on the situation that Connie and Sam are facing.

Today, let’s suppose that Connie has just been told that a major customer wants to do business with her.  This happens and, when it happens, it puts small businesses in an awkward situation.  A small business owner like Connie may face issues such as:

  1. An immediate needs to ramp up operations.  This sounds like a great problem to have.  For many businesses, ramping up to support a large customer creates a tremendous strain for the existing infrastructure and relationships, internal and external.
  2. Limited funds may be available for expansion.  Often supporting a large customer may require a firm like Connie’s business to dedicate staff to support the large customer, especially early on in the relationship.  More office space, customer service representatives, computers, telephones, software licenses, travel, and office expenses are just a few of the expenses associated with expanding a business to support a major customer.
  3. Deciding if Connie can afford to win the business at this point.  One of the hardest things that a business can do is to walk away from business.  If a business is unable to meet the needs of a large customer, it is important for that business to walk away so that both businesses can have a positive relationship when theh small business reaches the point that it can support the large customer. 
  4. Substantial outlays may be required to support the agreement.  Depending on Connie’s business, she may be required to combine her products and services with those of other firms, such as Sam’s products. 
  5. Addressing infrastructure and scalability issues while maintaining the attributes that customers value.  Customers often select smaller firms like Connie’s business because the customers value customer service, responsiveness, flexibility, and ease of doing business with the smaller company.  Of course, the smaller firms also need to offer products and/or services that meets the customers’ needs. 
  6. Continuing to meet the needs of existing customers who are concerned about Connie’s commitment to their business.  This is a typical reaction of customers when a business like Connie’s firm suddenly has a relationship with a new customer and meeting the needs of the new customer forces rapid expansion of the business.    
  7. How dependent Connie wishes for her business to be on any one customer for most or all of her revenue.  If Connie’s business is dependent on a single customer for most (or even all) of its revenue, where will the business be if the customer is dissatified, reorganizes, is acquired, decides to sell pieces of its operation, or faces an economic downturn?  Many firms establish guidelines that suggest suppliers not be overly dependent on their business as a source of revenue.  Many firms would suggest that their business should not provide more than 25% to 30% of the annual revenue for Connie’s business.  
  8. Bargaining power and resources in the event that a dispute arises between Connie and her customer.  This is a tremendous challenge.  Issues can arise, especially if Connie and her customer have not worked together previously.  The best time for Connie and the large customer to decide how to deal with an issue is at the start of their relationship.  That way, both firms are positioned to make good business decisions and they go into the relationships with firm expectations about how to proceed.   

Do these sound like concerns that you would have, if you were in Connie’s situation?

Now that the concerns have been identified, let’s think about how Connie’s relationship with Sam might help her deal with these issues. 

Cost

An existing relationship with Sam might enable Connie to lower her costs associated with ramping up and the outlays required to support the relationship. 

In many cases, a firm in Sam’s situation might be willing to help with the ordering process.  That can take a variety of forms.  Perhaps, Sam has an online ordering mechanism that can be tailored or replicated to support orders by Connie’s customer.  In other instances, suppliers like Sam have been willing to provide their customers with more favorable credit terms or even repayment that is linked to payment by Connie’s customers. 

Much of the time, a firm in Sam’s situation will increase the discounts to reflect the additional business which it is likely to realize. 

The nature of the relationship between Connie and Sam often determines the steps that Sam is willing to take to help Connie in this situation.  The book that I am currently writing will talk about actions that a person can take to build relationships that lead to more support from suppliers.

Predictability

In this situation, predictability is critical for both Connie and Sam.  Connie needs to be able to focus on her business and on her new customer.  She is going  to have great difficulty focusing on her business and her new customer if Connie is uncertain what to expect from Sam.  

As you realize, issues frequently arise in relationships with new customers as the parties being to understand each other.  Payment delays, invoice questions, and differences in expectations sometimes go undetected until the relationship starts.  My book on building relationships discusses several techniques for managing this risk.

So too, Sam needs to know what to expect from Connie.  Will she be prepared and organized?  Is she going to educate her customer so that the customer seldom needs to change orders?  Returns increase Sam’s cost of doing business with Connie as well.  He needs to understand what to expect so that Sam can make appropriate business decisions as well. 

Referral Opportunities

When Sam understands Connie’s business and how she makes money, he is better positioned to make referrals that will be of value for her business.  If Sam is able to make such referrals, he can help Connie manage her dependency on the large new customer.

Conversely, when Connie understands Sam’s business, she is better positioned to make referrals that will have value for his business.  In many cases, Connie’s new customer will need products and services that Sam might be able to offer which are outside the scope of Connie’s relationship with the customer.  Where Connie knows Sam and knows that he will meet her customer’s expectations, she is far more likely to make introductions than she would make if she did not have a relationship with Sam.

Streamlining Operations

When relationships being, there are two typical results.  On the one hand, it is possible that the firms will have no controls in place.  Connie and Sam may be acting on the assumption that their expectations are the same.  At some point, an issue is likely to arise and they will implement controls to avoid problems.  In many cases, they go from having no controls to having iron clad controls as a “knee jerk” reaction to issues.  On the other hand, Connie or Sam may have experienced issues in a prior relationship and be concerned with avoiding a repeat.  In this situation, they are likely to start with iron clad controls. 

A better way of handling this issue is to identify consequences that can arise and to have contingency plans for dealing with such issues when they do arise.  There are tools for implementing such approaches from the beginning and some of those tools will be discussed in my book about building relationships.  In other cases though, Connie and Sam would likely evolve to controls that meet their needs by trial and error.  In many cases, firms miss this opportunity because they focus on what is needed (process), rather than why it is needed (to meet needs of the business). 

Capitalizing on existing synergies 

Synergies often exist between customers and suppliers. 

When the Connies and Sams build relationships and understand each other, they are far more likely to find other areas in which they can work together to increase efficiency, improve effectiveness, and lower cost. 

If the other person is just a voice on the other end of the telephone who fills an order, Connie and Sam are likely to miss tremendous opportunities to work together and to help each other build better businesses through business relationships.

Coming next, we will talk about a situation in which Connie and Sam work together to deal with a supplier consolidation effort by Connie’s customer.

Posted in Negotiations, New Ideas, Solving Problems | No Comments »



Building Relationships - II
Tuesday, March 27th, 2007

Yesterday, I said that Connie Customer and Sam Supplier are trying to build a long-term business relationship.

Why would Connie and Sam want to do this?  In today’s business environment, that is a great question and the question that will launch this discussion.

There are a variety of reasons that Connie and Sam might benefit from having a long-term business relationships.  As will be discussed in this article and in the book that I am currently writing about building business relationships, long-term relationships can help firms with regard to:

  1. Cost
  2. Ease of use
  3. Predictability
  4. Referral opportunities
  5. Streamlining administration
  6. Capitalizing on existing synergies 

Our discussion begins now with consideration of the theory.  Tomorrow, our discussion will aply the theory to the facts presented in this series.  As always, please feel free to pose questions or suggest other ideas. 

Cost

If the parties begin a new relationship, there are a variety of direct and indirect costs associated with the new relationship.  One of the most obvious costs is simply the out-of-pocket cost associated with implementing a new agreement.  By building a long-term relationships, the costs of implementing new relationships might be eliminated.  The context determines what costs are associated with implementing a relationship. 

Modify other relationships.  Often, firms purchase products and services for resale and bundle those items with items provided internally or from third parties.  When a new relationship commences, the other relationships may require modification.  Depending on the circumstances, this can result in cancellation charges, charges for terminating agreements, higher unit prices, and a need for other suppliers.   

Secure equipment and personnel.  When a relationship begins, it is often necessary for the parties to obtain additional equipment and personnel to meet the obligations under the new contract.  By entering into a long-term relationship, the parties are able to seek lower cost options (such as purchasing equipment, rather than leasing it or enter into longer-term leases which often have a lower cost for a given unit of time). 

As it relates to personnel, people may be employed, rather than contracted with and temporary staffing may be avoided when a longer-term relationship is involved.  Often, employees are available at a lower charge than contracted individuals or temporary staffing firms would charge.

So too, storage space, office space, training, and travel may be increased to support new relationships.  Those costs can be spread over the life of the contract to reduce the annual cost. 

Other Costs.  Time is often the largest cost associated with negotiating a relationship itself.  It can require weeks and months, sometimes years, for people to develop a relationship that meets their needs.

Ease of Use

In addition to cost, having a long-term relationship simplifies use for the customer.  When a new relationship is negotiated, it can take tremendous amounts of time and communication to educate the audience about the new relationship, what is required, the scope of the relationship, the costs associated with the products and services, and what to expect. 

At times, transitioning from one relationship to another is a bit like trying to stop a battleship on a dime.  It takes a lot of effort to change suppliers and it is often easier to stay with the supplier that is already known.

Although this article is written in terms of “long-term” relationships, that might mean one year, three years, five years or more.  The phrase is intended to suggest a relationship that is expected to be on-going, although performance and needs of the business may justify a change in plans. 

Predictability

Imagine what would happen if a firm consistently charged different prices for the same services.  Suppose that the customers were greeted with different terms each time they purchased a product or service.  If these conditions were to exist, how would Connie and the millions of other firms in the US ensure that they were in compliance with their contracts?  How much would that cost?

Knowing what to expect and how to work with the other party to a contract makes it easier for firms to work together.  When a new relationship begins, the parties may “speak” different languages and have different expectations.  Over time, if they grow to know each other, the firms learn what to expect and what is expected of them.

Predictability has a lot of business in business.  It allows customers to focus on their businesses and suppliers to focus on theirs.  From time to time, adjustments are needed, of course.  On a daily basis, firms are able to concentrate on their core competencies, rather than worrying about whether the other parties to their existing relationships are going to fulfill their contractual obligations.

Referral Opportunities

When suppliers and customers build strong relationships, the relationships often lead to referral opportunities in the contexts of suppliers, customers and employees.  Even students at a local community college talk about job opportunities, suppliers, and customers.  Word of mouth advertising like this is common when parties in a relationships know and respect each other.  Just as referrals from others is a valuable way to select doctors, accountants, and attorneys, so too it can be used to select other suppliers. 

Streamlining Administration

When each contract is unique, compliance with the contract terms imposes a significant administrative burden on firms.  Consequently, limiting the number of separate agreements helps firms control their administrative costs. 

Capitalizing on existing synergies

The parties in a relationship usually have a shared interest in the relationship continuing and, in many cases, growing.  Allowing the relationship to expand to areas that are of interest to the parties allows them to capitalize on the parties’ synergies and to help each other have a more successful relationship.

Posted in Negotiations, Planning Tips, Solving Problems | No Comments »