Wednesday, November 7th, 2007
The other day, John had a terrible negotiation. It went downhill from the instant he picked up the telephone. The customer was angry about how John had handled an issue. John was unprepared for the discussion. The customer started yelling at him, and John went on the defensive. The situation went from bad to worse.
What might John have done to avoid or deal with this issue?
For me, this is the cost justification for voice mail, caller ID, answering machines, and having people screen calls. These approaches yield results in two ways.
First, this approach reduces the risk that John will say something he regrets, or in anger. Once the words are spoken, it is very difficult to retract them. Often, if people have a built-in pause, they are less likely to say something they regret.
Second, this approach can provide John with enough information to prepare for the discussion. When John knows who is calling, he can (1) talk with his team about the account and see if there are known issues, (2) find out how the relationship is working from his team’s perspective, and (3) prepare for the discussion. In many cases, John may identify options or solutions that address the problems before returning the call. If John can do this, his value to all parties increases.
What other steps can John take to prevent or deal with the situation?
Technorati Tags: negotiation problem solving conflict avoidance conflict resolution communication teams
