Home  Clients  How We Work  Services  Case Studies   About Us

Archive for the 'Resources' Category



Path Forward: Making the good decisions about business
Sunday, July 15th, 2007

In business and life, it is important to make the best decisions we can.  Often, we have inadequate information.  Sometimes, as our experiences grow, our perspective changes.  When that occurs, it is a good idea to take a step back and look at the options and assumptions a person has made.  Recently, that is exactly what I have done with regard to my family’s business.

LodgeFamily Business

As those of you who have been reading my blog know, my family owns a 12 room fishing lodge in Oregon. 

This lodge gave me the chance to grow up in a very rural, rugged, and beautiful place. It also gave a strong work ethic, opportunities, and experience.  

Pros and Cons

RiverFamily businesses bring their own set of opportunities and issues.  My family’s business experienced them both.

The pros (benefits) of working in a family businesses can include working with family members, spending time together, family members sharing a common interests, and emotional support for other members of the family.  In my case, working in the business gave me the chance to meet great customers (who became friends) who taught me so much about business. 

The cons (costs) of a family business can include the requirement that family members set aside personal conflicts and feelings in order to meet the needs of the business, may have perspectives about what is important, and business issues can lead to familial conflict.

RiverPerspective

The grass often looks greener on the other side of the fence.  The color of the grass depends on the lenses through which a person is looking and what matters to the person at that moment in time. 

Just like the weather in Oregon (give it a minute and it can change), so too a person’s perspective can change.  When people are just starting out, they may be driven by items at the bottom of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.  As those needs are satisfied, their motivation may move up the pyramid.

Decision

Lodge viewMy father has been operating the family business for over 30 years and he wants to slow down. Beyond that, he wanted to make sure that my siblings and I had the ability to decide whether we operated the family business.

After considering all of the possibilities, I have decided to return to Oregon and to help my father operate the fishing lodge.  

My vision and plan will allow me to grow the family business while helping people build business relationships (negotiate contracts, network, resolve conflicts) and develop their business skills.

Creek

Opportunities

Need a vacation and want to go someplace quiet? 

Seeking a small meeting venue where cell phones don’t ring? 

Are you looking for practical solutions to your business puzzles that are described in any of my blogs?

If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, ask yourself if there is something that you think I can do to help you. 

For many of the questions, including help finding jobs, the approaches that I have used are described in this blog.  The ideas in this blog are generic, as most “free” solutions are. 

Do you have a budget and need solutions that are tailored to your situation or need additional information?  If so, please send me a note at infoli@c-davisconsulting.com to see if I may be able to help you.  

Posted in About Coleen Davis, Business Acumen, Resources, Solving Problems | No Comments »



Rained out! Monitoring weather risks
Sunday, July 8th, 2007

In baseball, games can be rained out.  At my family’s fishing lodge in Oregon, we sometimes have fishing trips that are rained out as well. 

In the early summer, it is a bit unexpected to find businesses in North Texas rained out.  The unusual amounts of rain this year - sometimes more than eight inches over the normal amount - have left many businesses rained out and disrupted a lot of transportation.  Case in point, Lake Lewisville in Texas was high enough that it closed the southbound service road to I35 and could have easily closed I35 itself with just one more day of rain.  For more on the flooding, this search on Yahoo will provide a lot of information.

We have little ability to control weather like this.  Instead, it is important to identify weather risks, develop contingency plans, and execute the contingency plans if they are necessary.  One tool for monitoring weather related risks is the National Weather Service. 

One tool for executing the contingency plan is the telephone.  Make sure the other party to the relationship knows that the plan is being executed.  This allows them to prepare for risks.  Sometimes, products may arrive early and require storage space.  In other cases the situation escalates and performance becomes impossible.  If people know about the situation, they can deal with it.  If they don’t know, how can they prepare?

[t_targets:  flooding, business, communication, water risks, negotiation, contingency plans]

Posted in Business Acumen, Customers, Negotiations, Resources, Solving Problems, Sourcing | No Comments »



A place to get away: Rogue River
Thursday, June 21st, 2007

Technology has crashed timelines in ways that even 10 years ago would have been unthinkable. 

Often, instead of working 12 to 14 hour days, people are working 16 or 18 hour days.  At what price to health, family, and business are these hours worked?

Some brag about getting over 500 email messages per day.  Is this something to brag about?

In such an environment, it is important to take the time to slow down, to breathe, and to think.  Otherwise, people end up trying to be the fastest rat in the race.  As a friend said a couple years ago, even when one is the fastest rat in the race, one is still just a rat.  This emphasis on doing more, better, and faster causes a lot of stress for people.  In some cases, it contributes to health problems.  For others, it can lead to isolation or poor performance in business and in school.

With so much technology though, this can be difficult to take the time to slow down and to breathe.  As a result, many have to physically remove themselves from the environment in order to actually remove the telephone from their ear and the Blackberry from their hand.

Rogue RiverWhen people are trying to remove themselves from the environment, one of the most beautiful places to go is the Rogue River in Oregon.  Sure, this is my opinion. 

As it happens, a lot of people agree with me.  Every year, people sign up to win the chance to go down the Rogue River via boat.  Others hike on trails along its banks.   

Think about it.  When you are trying to decompress, is it more relaxing to listen to a cellphone and fax machine, or the lapping of water and the rustling of trees? 

The Rogue River is a National Wild and Scenic River in Oregon.  Much of the area is part of a National Forest as well. 

From time to time, it is important to take the time to “just be.”  When I feel like taking the time to just be, the Rogue River is the perfect place for me. 

Trom time to time, I will share a bit more about one of my favorite places, the Rogue River in Oregon.

For those who can’t wait, perhaps you will find the following items interesting…

Rogue River/Siskiyou National Forest

Wikipedia Rogue River

Wikipedia Crater Lake 

Technorati Tags:          
 
Posted in About Coleen Davis, Planning Tips, Resources, Solving Problems | No Comments »



Soft Power by Joseph Nye
Sunday, June 3rd, 2007

Sitting at DFW Airport in the middle of a groundstop gave me the chance to read <u>Soft Power</u> by Joseph Nye.  It had been sitting on my bookshelf for several months, waiting for me to find time.

<u>Soft Power</u>, it is a great read.  It is a book that really needs to be read slowly.  The wording is easy to read and understand.  Soft power is the ability to win support (love).  Hard power is the ability to force others to behave in a way through domination and force (fear).

As an aside, when reading books like <u>Soft Power</u>, it can be helpful to underline key points, read the book aloud, read slowly, and jot notes.  These steps build time into the process.  The time allows readers to think about what the author is saying and what it means for the reader. 

Posted in Business Acumen, Resources | No Comments »



The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: A case study on the Rogue National Wild and Scenic River in Oregon - Part 2
Saturday, May 26th, 2007

Written by Coleen Rutledge Davis
April 27, 1990

This is part 2 of an article written about the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act in 1990.  Please verify the current relevance of all information contained in this article, rather than relying on its contents as part of your decision-making process. 

Legislative History

In the 1960s, substantial concern was expressed for the protection of outdoor recreational activities.  Congress responded to this concern by creating the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission and, later, the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation.8  This was followed by enactment of the Wilderness Act in 1964.9  A few years later, President Johnson established the President’s Council on Recreation and Natural Beauty and the Citizens’ Advisory Committee on Recreation and Natural Beauty.10  Against this backdrop, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was passed in 1968.

The legislative history of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act indicates congressional recognition of five principles.  First, the legislative material indicates that certain rivers should be preserved for public use and enjoyment.11  ”Preserve” means “[t]o keep in perfect or unaltered condition; maintain in an unchanged form.”12  If this was the definition intended by Congress, the Act was intended to restrict prospective changes to the river’s character, as measured from the date of designation.  Such an interpretation is strengthened by statements of Senator Hatfield who said that the Act does not attempt to “undo” development or to interfere with existing activities.13  The Act establishes a classification system which provides further support for the view that the Act was only intended to limit prospective changes.14  In fact, one member of Congress has argued that new uses which are consistent with the Act are to be allowed.15  Clearly, Congress did not intend for the Act to be used to create a de facto wilderness.16

The second principle found in the legislative history is that Congress wished to encourage states to preserve rivers for public use and enjoyment.17  Although the legislative history remains silent on why state involvement is to be encouraged, this goal is probably related to economics, political issues, and administrative concerns.  The procedure for inclusion of state-designated rivers in the System is one manifestation of this objective.18

Third, the legislative history demonstrates congressional recognition that rivers vary and should be preserved for different reasons.19  One river may have outstanding geologic value and another may have great historic or recreational value.  In this situation, Congress apparently intended to leave decisions about which characteristics are worthy of preservation to the administrative branch of government.

Fourth, governmental acquisitions under the Act are to be minimized.20  In fact, Representative DeFazio makes it clear that the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was not intended to expand federal condemnation power.21  Economic and political concerns undoubtedly resulted in recognition of this principle.  Acquisition of all lands within the boundaries of a river in the System would be very expensive.22  Such acquisitions might be politically unpopular as well.  Beyond these considerations, federal agencies might have great difficulty operating some businesses found on rivers in the System.

Special use permits are issued for some business activities because of perceived needs for services that agencies are unable to provide.23  A guide service is one example of a business that would be difficult for a federal agency to operated.  Expertise is essential in providing customers with safe fishing and rafting trips.  Expertise is also necessary for business to be profitable.  In addition, guide services are extremely labor intensive.  This industry has the potential for enormous liability.24  For these reasons, guiding is a service that the federal government does not wish to provide.

In recognition of these concerns and the need to control and and river use, Congress intended that agencies regulate land use by easement, rather than by fee simple acquisitions.25  This intent is reflected by Senator Hatfield’s comments during the floor debate of the Omnibus Oregon Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1988.26

Fifth, the legislative materials indicate and the Act demonstrates that rivers are to be added to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System only after considered deliberation.27 Several practical considerations justify this approach. Perhaps the most obvious justification for deliberation is that, when a river is added to the System, the congressional intent is to preserve the river in its then-existing condition in perpetuity.  Federal funds must be allocated for management activities.  The economy around the river may stagnate since new industries may be inconsistent with the river’s designation and existing businesses may be unable to expand.  Beyond this, the river’s potential as a source of power is reduced.28  All of these factors suggest that substantial analysis is desirable before rivers are added to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

—–

Footnotes for Part 2

8. S.R. REP. NO. 11, 89th Congr., 1st Sess. 1, reprinted in1963 U.S. CODE CONG. & ADMIN. NEWS 664.

9. 16 U.S.C. sections 1131 - 1361.

10. Exec. Order No 11,278, 31 Fed. Reg. 6,681 (1966).

11. H.R. REP. NO. 1632, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. 6, reprinted in 1968 U.S. CODE CONG. & ADMIN. NEWS 3801 at 3803.

12. THE AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE 1036 (New College Edition 1980).

13. 134 CONG. REC. S15236, S15243 (daily ed. Oct. 7, 1988) (Statement of Senator Hatfield).

14. See 16 U.S.C. section 1273(b) (1988).

15. 134 CONG. REC. H10109, H10115 (daily ed. Oct. 12, 1988) (Statement of Rep. DeFazio).

16. 134 CONG. REC. H10109, H10115 (daily ed. Oct. 12, 1988) (Statement of Rep. Smith).

17. H.R. REP. NO. 1632, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. 6, reprinted in 1968 U.S. CODE CONG. & ADMIN. NEWS 3801 at 3803.

18. 16 U.S.C. section 1273(a).

19. H.R. REP. NO. 1632, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. 6, reprinted in 1968 U.S. CODE CONG. & ADMIN. NEWS 3801 at 3803.

20. H.R. REP. NO. 1632, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. 6, reprinted in 1968 U.S. CODE CONG. & ADMIN. NEWS 3801 at 3803.

21. 134 CONG. REC. H10109, H10115 (daily ed. Oct. 12, 1988) (Statement of Rep. DeFazio).

22. See113 CONG. REC. 21742, 21750 (1967) (statement of Sen. Nelson).

23. Outfitting and Guiding Permits, Proposed Policy 48 Fed. Reg. 15,296, 15,297 (1983).

24. E.g., Harmon v. United States 532 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1975).

25. See 16 U.S.C. section 1277(b) (1988).

26. 134 CONG. REC. S15236, S15243 (daily ed. Oct. 7, 1988) (Statement of Senator Hatfield).

27. H.R. REP. NO. 1632, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. 6, reprinted in 1968 U.S. CODE CONG. & ADMIN. NEWS 3801 at 3804.

28. 113 CONG. REC. 21742, 21745 (1967) (Statement of Senator Church).

Technorati Tags:                
 
Posted in Achieving Goals, Business Acumen, Resources, Solving Problems | No Comments »



The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: A case study on the Rogue National Wild and Scenic River in Oregon - Part 1
Saturday, May 19th, 2007

by Coleen Rutledge Davis
April 27, 1990

For Public Lands Law

Preface - May 2007

As this paper was written in 1990 when I was a third year law student, parts of it are out of date and will be updated in the future. Many of the historical documents would be difficult for others to locate so, for that reason, the paper is being posted in this blog.

The postings will be made in sections. This posting is the first of six that will make up the body of the paper.

Introduction

This paper is concerned with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, 16 U.S.C. section 1271 - 1287 (1988). This statute establishes a complex and highly variable management scheme. As a consequence, this paper will rely heavily on the paplication of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (the Act) to the Rogue River. In this way, the paper will be better able to provide a general understanding of the Act.

The author selected the Rogue River for this case study for four reasons. First, the author is familiar with the Rogue River and its administration under the Act. Second, the Rogue River has been administered under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act since the Act was passed. Third, most of the administrative materials to which the author has access relate to the Rogue River. Finally, the lobbying efforts of visitors to and residents of the Rogue River area played a large part in the passage of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.

Under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, the history of a river is very important in determining how the river wil be administered. For that reasn, this paper will begin by introducing the Rogue River. It will then discuss the origins of the Act, the legislative history of the Act, and important provisions of the Act. From there, the paperw ill discuss management under the Act in both general and specific terms. Finally, the paper will consider issues that arise when a river is considered for designation under the Act.

The Rogue River

The Rogue River is a rapidly flowing stream that cuts a path through southwestern Oregon as it carries waters from Crater Lake to the Pacific Ocean. Along the way, the Rogue River passes through wide, open valleys, and deep narrow canyons. The River’s banks are lined with tree-covered slopes, granite cliffs, and sandy beaches. Along the Rogue River, wildlife is abundant and includes deer, black bear, beavers, otters, and Roosevelt elk. In the water, salmon, steelhead, sturgeon, and eels are found. Soaring above the River, pair of bald eagle, many blue herons, egrets, and buzzards are among the common sites.

Today, thousands of people visit the Rogue River annually. These visitors come from every state and many foreign countries. The Rogue River’s fame comes from its quality as a fishing stream, its natural scenic beauty, and its white-water boat trips.1Visitors enjoy the River in up to three ways. Some enjoy the stillness of its deep canyons followed by the rushing of water over rapids as they float down the river in rafts, kayaks, and the like. Others walk in the paths of the pioneers and Indians on trails built more than 1o0 years ago. On parts of the Rogue River, powerboats provide access for visitors who cannot otherwise see the river (and for residents lacking road access).

Commercial boating on the Rogue River has a long history. As a small child, the author heard many stories about freight being poled upstream from Gold Beach to Agness about 1900. Beginning around 1930, motors began to be used on these boats. Today, motor boats are still used to haul groceries to lodges in the Wild Section.

Motorboats have been used in guiding and tours on the Rogue River for many years. These activities began before the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was passed in 1968. Today, these uses continue and the public demand for these services has increased dramatically since the Rogue River was designated under the Act.

Commercial boating also involves the use of drift boats and rafts. The rafting is relatively new, but drift boats have long been used for fishing trips through the Rogue River Canyon.

The newest use of boats on the River involves the use of rafts for private purposes. The private recreational party is a development that has occurred since the 1960s. Private recreational parties are the result of increased publicity for the Rogue River, increased interest in outdoor recreation, and improvements in the quality and durability of materials used to construct the rafts.

Visitors to the Rogue Rvier see several residences from the water. Within the Rogue National Wild and Scenic River, a few small communities and several scattered lodges are located. The Agness Recreational Area provides a good example of this. The Agness Recreational Area includes the communities of both Agness and Illahe. The Area is eleven river-miles long on the Rogue River and three river-miles long on the Illinois River.

Most of the people residing in the confines of the Rogue National Wild and Scenic River are of Indian heritage. The Rogue River has a long history of Indian population. It may have been named by French fur trappers for the hostile Indians who lived along its banks.2Numerous artifacts ahve been found along the Rogue River.

In 1851, gold was discovered near the mouth of the Applegate River.3 With this discovery, minors came to the Rogue River. Although most of the river had placer mining for gold, very little evidence of that activity remains. The remaining signs consist primarily of extensive water trenches, some rusted mining equipment, and a few mining scars on the canyon walls.

Eighty-four miles of the Rogue River has been designated as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (the System). The Rogue River is also impacted by the Wild and Scenic River designation of the Illinois River, one of its major tributaries. Other federal land management schemes are extremely important in understanding the Rogue National Wild and Scenic River. Since the Rogue River flows through Siskiyou National Forest, the management plan applicable to the forest is very important. In addition, part of the Wild Section of the Rogue River is included in the Wild Rogue Wilderness.4Aside from the management schemes developed for these resources, several species of both plants and animals are protected under the Endangered Species Act.5

Origins of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

In 1966, there was a strong possibility that the Rogue River would cease to exist in its then-existing condition. A proposal had been made to build a hydroelectric power plant and a dam at Copper Canyon. The proposal would have converted much of the Rogue River into a lake and raised water levels approximately 600 feet over eleven miles upstream from the project. In fact, the project would have given Grants Pass pool frontage and almost all the Rogue National Wild and Scenic River would have been covered with water. 6

People who relied on the River for their livelihood and recreation held a meeting at The Illahe Lodge, a fishing lodge owned by the author’s family. This meeting resulted in The Wild Rivers Committee of Oregon (of which the author’s grandfather was the first chairman).7 The Organization hoped to prevent the hydroelectric project by means of state legislation. When this was unsuccessful, the Organization and the Sierra Club joined forces to advocate federal legislation protecting the Rogue River. There were many amendments during the course of congressional debate, but the eventual result was the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.

—–

Footnotes  for Part 1

1.  H.R. Rep. No. 1623, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 6, reprinted in 1968 U.S. CODE CONG. & ADMIN NEWS 3801, 3805.

2.  Preliminary Draft, Development and Management Plan for Implementation of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Bureau of Land Management 9 (1969).

3. See, Rogue National Wild and Scenic River - Revised Management Plan, 37 Fed. Reg. 13,408 (1972) [hereinafter Joint Management Plan].

4. Wilderness Act 16 U.S.C. sections 1131-1136 (1988).

5. Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. sections 1531-1544 (1988).

6. Telephone interview with Ernest R. Rutledge, Owner of the Illahe Lodge (Agness, Oregon) (Feb. 25, 1990).

7. OREGON GUIDES & PACKERS, INC., HUNTING AND FISHING IN OREGON, 1969 - 1970, at inside front cover (1969).

Technorati Tags:            
 
Posted in About Coleen Davis, Cultural Issues, Resources, Solving Problems, Team Building | No Comments »



Frank Kanu and Allan Gaskamp
Sunday, May 6th, 2007

In business networking, sometimes, I encounter people who really help me out.  I would like to take this opportunity to tell you about two people who have done so for my business.

Frank Kanu

In January 2005, I started networking online.  Through that experience, I met Frank Kanu at Genius One.  We talked about writing a book on negotiations even.  While that didn’t work out, Frank helped me in a variety of other ways. 

Frank hosts my website and my blog.  When I need help with either one, he is happy to help.  Frank has a tremendous amount of experience in IT that really makes him a great resource in this area.

He can see both the details, and the big picture.  He helps leaders break down their projects and he helps people at a lower level of an organization understand how they fit into the big picture.  From what I have seen, Frank is great at helping both leaders and people at lower levels of organizations think about business and learn to ask the right questions. 

Frank has written a book that helps people ask questions, rather than relying on assumptions.  That would make a great graduation gift for anyone just starting out, by the way.  If you are already in business, I suggest calling Frank and talking with him about your situation because it will lead to better tips and save you time. 

I keep telling Frank that he needs to create something that is going to attract people’s attention.  Frank says that too many consultants look good on paper, and miss the mark on results so he just sticks with what he knows, how to help people by providing advice that has value for them… 

In contrast, Allan has a product that really looks nice, even online.

Allan Gaskamp

In the fall of 2006, I met Allan Gaskamp who owns ID Tags.  Allan is a small business owner, just as Frank is.  Allan’s business is promotional items.  What is a promotional item, some may ask.  Promotional items are mugs, cups, glasses, key chains, bandanas, tote bags, lunch pails, pens, pencils, paper, shirts, caps, etc. that are used to grow a business.  

Over the past few months, Allan has provided me with ceramic mugs and a promotional item.   The promotional item was a demo to see how if people liked it.  As it turned out, they seemed to like it.  The glass cutting board for meats and cheeses. 

The cutting board lasted just a few days before it grew feet and walked away.  That is what you hope will happen when you buy promotional items.  Be sure that you are prepared to see the item walk away when purchasing promotional items.  While I loved the cutting board that Allan created (shown below), it was too expensive to provide as a promotional item. 

Promotional item - cutting board 

If you have a need in an area that either Frank Kanu or Allan Gaskamp can assist with, I hope that you will talk with them and see if there are opportunities for you to work with them.  Both have helped a lot of people over the years. 

Please use due diligence and good business judgment in selecting suppliers, even when it is someone that I talk about.  Our situations, priorities, and critical success factors may be different. 

Technorati Tags:                              
 
Posted in Customers, Gifts & Recognition, Marketing, Networking, Resources | 1 Comment »